Wt 3.3.5 Binaries
Added by Prasad Dixit over 8 years ago
Glad to see Wt 3.3.5 source released on Github. When can I expect binary builds?
Replies (8)
RE: Wt 3.3.5 Binaries - Added by Markus Klemm over 8 years ago
RE: Wt 3.3.5 Binaries - Added by Wim Dumon over 8 years ago
I'm working on the builds. Our build server/jenkins has had some issues lately.
Wim.
RE: Wt 3.3.5 Binaries - Added by Kayra Akman about 8 years ago
Hi,
I just installed Wt-3.3.5-msvs2013-Windows-x64-SDK.exe. Although Documentation was checked in the components-to-install list, Wt documentation was not installed. The only significant files in the doc folder are 3 Word documents in the tutorial folder.
Regards,
Kayra
RE: Wt 3.3.5 Binaries - Added by Wim Dumon about 8 years ago
Hey,
That's indeed an issue that slipped my mind. Since we moved to github for releases, our source tarballs don't contains documentation anymore. The binaries copy the documentation from the source. I will have to change that.
Wim.
RE: Wt 3.3.5 Binaries - Added by Kayra Akman about 8 years ago
Wt-3.3.5-msvs2013-Windows-x64-SDK.exe contains OpenSSL 1.0.2d which was released on July 9, 2015. Current OpenSSL version is 1.0.2f, i.e. 2 releases have been made after 1.0.2d.
RE: Wt 3.3.5 Binaries - Added by Kayra Akman almost 8 years ago
Wim Dumon wrote:
Hey,
That's indeed an issue that slipped my mind. Since we moved to github for releases, our source tarballs don't contains documentation anymore. The binaries copy the documentation from the source. I will have to change that.
Wim.
Wt installed from Wt-3.3.6-msvs2013-Windows-x64-SDK.exe doesn't include API reference and examples documentation.
RE: Wt 3.3.5 Binaries - Added by Wim Dumon almost 8 years ago
Kayra,
That's a known problem since we switched to github for making our releases. Thank you for reminding, can you create an issue for it?
Wim.
RE: Wt 3.3.5 Binaries - Added by Kayra Akman about 7 years ago
3.3.7 installers, at least MSVS2013 64bit installer, don't contain Wt documentation.
A related issue (#5137) had been opened after the discussion above.